Diferencia entre revisiones de «Propuestas:General/Changes to linguistic commission/Hubs/en»

De Wikimedia Small Projects
(Página creada con «=== By language === Contrary to project hubs, linguistic hubs only have the spoken language in commons. They are also "mega-cells" but are composed by each project to which…»)
(Página creada con «== Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission == This Committe would replace the Linguistic Commission and would have the task of choosing which is the best of course…»)
Línea 24: Línea 24:
* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.
* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.


<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
== Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission ==
== Comité/Comisión Central de Lenguas/Lingüística/Idiomas ==
This Committe would replace the Linguistic Commission and would have the task of choosing which is the best of course of action of the group over the defined projects in its reach. Contrary to its predecessor, it does not have the capacity of advising but instead of choosing, unless this affects the exclusive competences of the Administrative Commission and other components.
Este Comité sería el sustituto de la Comisión Lingüística y tendría la tarea de deliberar cuál es el mejor curso de acción del grupo sobre los proyectos definidos en su alcance. A diferencia de su predecesora, ya no tiene la capacidad de asesorar sino de decidir -a menos que esto afecte competencias exclusivas de la Comisión Administrativa u otros componentes-.
</div>