Propuestas:General/Changes to linguistic commission/Hubs/en - Historial de revisiones

NoonIcarus en 00:52 4 jun 2021

2021-06-04T00:52:41Z

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 00:52 4 jun 2021
Línea 20:		Línea 20:
	* Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.		* Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.

	It has certain		It has certain defects:
	* Up to 280 linguistic hubs could exist, an incredible overload to the group's current capacity,		* Up to 280 linguistic hubs could exist, an incredible overload to the group's current capacity,
	* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.		* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.

NoonIcarus: Página creada con «== Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission == This Committe would replace the Linguistic Commission and would have the task of choosing which is the best of course…»

2021-06-04T00:50:52Z

Página creada con «== Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission == This Committe would replace the Linguistic Commission and would have the task of choosing which is the best of course…»

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 00:50 4 jun 2021
Línea 24:		Línea 24:
	* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.		* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.

	~~<div lang~~=~~"es" dir~~=~~"ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">~~		== Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission ==
	~~== Comité~~/~~Comisión~~ Central ~~de Lenguas/Lingüística/Idiomas~~ ==		This Committe would replace the Linguistic Commission and would have the task of choosing which is the best of course of action of the group over the defined projects in its reach. Contrary to its predecessor, it does not have the capacity of advising but instead of choosing, unless this affects the exclusive competences of the Administrative Commission and other components.
	~~Este Comité sería el sustituto de la Comisión Lingüística y tendría la tarea de deliberar cuál es el mejor curso de acción del grupo sobre los proyectos definidos en su alcance~~. ~~A diferencia de su predecesora~~, ~~ya no tiene la capacidad de asesorar sino de decidir -a menos que esto afecte competencias exclusivas de la Comisión Administrativa u otros componentes-~~.
	~~</div>~~

NoonIcarus: Página creada con «=== By language === Contrary to project hubs, linguistic hubs only have the spoken language in commons. They are also "mega-cells" but are composed by each project to which…»

2021-06-04T00:49:01Z

Página creada con «=== By language === Contrary to project hubs, linguistic hubs only have the spoken language in commons. They are also "mega-cells" but are composed by each project to which…»

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 00:49 4 jun 2021
Línea 20:		Línea 20:
	* Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.		* Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.

	~~<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">~~		It has certain
	~~Tiene ciertos fallos:~~		* Up to 280 linguistic hubs could exist, an incredible overload to the group's current capacity,
	* ~~Podría existir más de~~ 280 linguistic hubs, ~~una sobrecarga increíble para la capacidad actual del grupo~~,		* Potential bias exist given that there would only be favorable opinions towards the dominant project. Eg: Wikipedia in Spanish over Wikivoyages; the former is a sucessful project, while the latter is one underdeveloped.
	* ~~Habría potenciales sesgos ya que solo habría opiniones en favor del proyecto dominante~~: ~~ej,~~ Wikipedia ~~en español sobre Wikiviajes~~; ~~el primero es un proyecto exitoso mientras que el segundo es no-desarrollado~~.
	~~</div>~~

	<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">		<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

NoonIcarus en 00:42 4 jun 2021

2021-06-04T00:42:03Z

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 00:42 4 jun 2021
Línea 11:		Línea 11:
	* The Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission would be reduced to ten members, which would increase choice-making efficiency.		* The Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission would be reduced to ten members, which would increase choice-making efficiency.

			It has a question:
	* Each language could or could not lack what other language might or might not too. This could be solved with a decision that after some time, the language's necessities inside a hub are taken after a period of time.		* Each language could or could not lack what other language might or might not too. This could be solved with a decision that after some time, the language's necessities inside a hub are taken after a period of time.

NoonIcarus: Página creada con «* Favorable points: * Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.»

2021-06-04T00:42:00Z

Página creada con «* Favorable points: * Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.»

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 00:42 4 jun 2021
Línea 13:		Línea 13:
	* Each language could or could not lack what other language might or might not too. This could be solved with a decision that after some time, the language's necessities inside a hub are taken after a period of time.		* Each language could or could not lack what other language might or might not too. This could be solved with a decision that after some time, the language's necessities inside a hub are taken after a period of time.

	~~<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">~~		=== By language ===
	=== ~~Por idioma~~ ===		Contrary to project hubs, linguistic hubs only have the spoken language in commons. They are also "mega-cells" but are composed by each project to which an ambassador is appointed to. Each project's ambassador would speak on behalf of their "embassy's" interests. Sais centers would issue their opinions to be considered by the Administrative Commission.
	~~Contrario a los~~ project hubs, ~~los~~ linguistic hubs~~, solo tienen en común el idioma hablado~~. ~~Son también ''~~mega-~~células~~'' ~~pero están compuestas por cada proyecto al cual se le designa un embajador. Cada embajador de cada proyecto hablaría para que los intereses de su~~ "~~embajada" estuviesen representados~~. ~~Estos centros emitirían sus opiniones para ser valorizadas por la Comisión Administrativa~~.
	~~</div>~~

	~~<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">~~		* Favorable points:
	* ~~Puntos favorables~~:		* Removed the Linguistic Commission completely and issues its opinions directly towards the Administrative Commission.
	* ~~Elimina completamente a la Comisión Lingüística y emite sus opiniones directamente hacia la Comisión Administrativa~~.
	~~</div>~~

	<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">		<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">

NoonIcarus: Página creada con «This proposal seeks to eliminate the component known as the Linguistic Commission and divides in two option. For this proposal "projects" are defined as wikis of the Wikime…»

2021-06-04T00:40:16Z

Página creada con «This proposal seeks to eliminate the component known as the Linguistic Commission and divides in two option. For this proposal "projects" are defined as wikis of the Wikime…»

Página nueva

<languages/>
This proposal seeks to eliminate the component known as the Linguistic Commission and divides in two option. For this proposal "projects" are defined as wikis of the Wikimedia Foundation. For instance, Wikivoyage is a wiki, Wikipedia is a wiki, and so on.

== Centres ==
=== By project ===
These project hubs share the interests of each volunteer to belong tothis project. Said "mega-cells" are made up of each linguistic version of the project and choose the project hub's representative before the Languages/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission.

This is a good idea because:
* They have a defined theme, since project hubs are naturally focused in a particular project,
* They remove language bias,
* The Language/Linguistic Committee/Central Commission would be reduced to ten members, which would increase choice-making efficiency.

* Each language could or could not lack what other language might or might not too. This could be solved with a decision that after some time, the language's necessities inside a hub are taken after a period of time.

<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
=== Por idioma ===
Contrario a los project hubs, los linguistic hubs, solo tienen en común el idioma hablado. Son también ''mega-células'' pero están compuestas por cada proyecto al cual se le designa un embajador. Cada embajador de cada proyecto hablaría para que los intereses de su "embajada" estuviesen representados. Estos centros emitirían sus opiniones para ser valorizadas por la Comisión Administrativa.
</div>

<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
* Puntos favorables:
* Elimina completamente a la Comisión Lingüística y emite sus opiniones directamente hacia la Comisión Administrativa.
</div>

<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Tiene ciertos fallos:
* Podría existir más de 280 linguistic hubs, una sobrecarga increíble para la capacidad actual del grupo,
* Habría potenciales sesgos ya que solo habría opiniones en favor del proyecto dominante: ej, Wikipedia en español sobre Wikiviajes; el primero es un proyecto exitoso mientras que el segundo es no-desarrollado.
</div>

<div lang="es" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
== Comité/Comisión Central de Lenguas/Lingüística/Idiomas ==
Este Comité sería el sustituto de la Comisión Lingüística y tendría la tarea de deliberar cuál es el mejor curso de acción del grupo sobre los proyectos definidos en su alcance. A diferencia de su predecesora, ya no tiene la capacidad de asesorar sino de decidir -a menos que esto afecte competencias exclusivas de la Comisión Administrativa u otros componentes-.
</div>